A New Kind of Leveled Text that Meets the Needs of Challenged Readers

Elfrieda Hiebert
Elfrieda Hiebert
25 Jul
Share this article

Short sentences and less text don’t add up to proficient reading. But that’s exactly what the current wave of leveled texts offers. Texts for challenged readers have fewer words and shorter sentences than texts for proficient readers. Decades of research indicate that texts with fewer words and short sentences don’t make reading easier. In fact, short sentences can be harder for challenged readers because demands for making inferences are greater when the connecting ideas have been removed. And, as in every domain of life, you don’t get good at something if you don’t do it.  The quantity of reading matters.

So, what does affect the difficulty level of a text? In a word: vocabulary. Vocabulary, and the knowledge that it represents, is the best indicator of how well students comprehend. The current wave of leveled texts doesn’t consider vocabulary because vocabulary isn’t a big factor in the assignment of either Lexiles or Guided Reading Levels. The ratio of rare or hard words in current leveled texts for challenged readers is often the same—or even higher—as that found in texts for proficient readers.

Learn more about our innovative new myView Literacy Program for Grades K-5 – Request a sample today! (NOTE: Texas Educators click here for your customized version!)

Challenged readers need texts with the same ideas but with fewer nonessential rare words.  For example, a word such as shelters is basic to a text on animal shelters. The occasional insertion of words such as kennel or lair can divert challenged readers from the theme and make them less competent with the word shelter—a word that students are fifty times more likely to see in subsequent texts than kennel and a hundred times more likely to encounter than lair.

In myView Literacy, a new generation of leveled texts puts into action the research on what challenged readers need to become highly proficient readers.  The differentiated texts in myView Literacy have the same amount of text and the same ideas in similarly coherent sentences for challenged and proficient readers.  That is, hard ideas aren’t taken out and sentences aren’t shortened to attain Lexile levels. The treatment of vocabulary provides the essential difference across texts of different levels.  In texts for challenged readers, key ideas are repeated with the same words—words that are engaging but also essential to future reading. For example, the word shelter would be repeated several times in a text on animal shelters rather than substituting shelter with kennel or lair.

Once students are comfortable with words such as shelter, they will have many opportunities to read texts with kennel and lair. The new generation of leveled texts in myView Literacy prepares challenged readers for complex texts by giving them the same volume of texts as their peers receive. Additionally, they read texts with coherent sentences and engaging, essential vocabulary.

Learn more about our innovative new myView Literacy Program for Grades K-5 – Request a sample today! (NOTE: Texas Educators click here for your customized version!)


Dr. Elfrieda Hiebert is President and CEO of TextProject, a nonprofit that provides open-access resources to support higher reading levels, and a research associate at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Hiebert received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She has worked in the field of early reading acquisition for 45 years, as a teacher’s aide and teacher in California and, as a teacher educator at universities across the nation. Hiebert’s research on fostering fluency, vocabulary, and knowledge through appropriate texts has been published in numerous scholarly journals and books. She has been the recipient of several awards for her work, including International Reading Association’s William S. Gray Citation of Merit and the American Educational Research Association’s Research to Practice award.


Cunningham, J. W., Hiebert, E. H., & Mesmer, H. A. (2018). Investigating the validity of two widely used quantitative text tools. Reading and Writing31(4), 813-833.  Research study download

Hiebert, E.H. (2017). The texts of literacy instruction:  Obstacles to or opportunities for educational equity?  Literacy Research:  Theory, Method, and Practice, 66(1), 117-134.  Research study download

Latest Posts

Fresh Ideas for Teaching Blog - The Danger of Teaching in Silos

The Danger of Teaching in Silos

Exposing students to the...
Patricia Brown
Read More
By Patricia Brown | This week
Thomas Dennison - Flexible Seating - Fresh Ideas for Teaching Blog

So do you do flexible seating?

I get way too defensive when...
Thomas Dennison
Read More
By Thomas Dennison | 12 Apr
Angela Goetz
Read More
By Angela Goetz | 10 Apr